Quantcast
Home / education / House and Senate Republicans introduce school closure plans

House and Senate Republicans introduce school closure plans

E

Republicans in the House and Senate have filed legislation to allow teachers to educate their students in “alternative” formats as schools grapple with statewide closures in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. 

It’s the latest attempt at passing emergency measures to provide short-term certainty to government entities and citizens as the legislature contemplates suspending the session for a period of weeks or longer to mitigate the spread of the virus. 

If schools don’t reopen by the end of March, the bill waives statutory instruction hour requirements provided schools can offer instruction in an “alternative format” of their choice. Doing this secures their state funding, which is contingent on students being in class for a certain number of days each year. 

In short, should the bill pass, schools will not be forced to elongate the school year in order to make up for the instructional time lost since Gov. Doug Ducey and Superintendent Kathy Hoffman announced indefinite statewide school closures on March 15. 

Sylvia Allen

Sylvia Allen

“Every district and school will have flexibility in how they continue to offer educational instruction to their students,” said Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake, who authored the Senate version of the bill. 

Rep. Michelle Udall, R-Mesa, who’s carrying the House version, could not be reached for comment in time for publication. 

The bill has two contingency clauses. If schools reopen by the end of March, the bill waives instructional hour requirements and extends the window to administer the state’s standardized test until May 31. All school employees, hourly or otherwise, will receive pay for the duration of the closure, and schools can use the higher of their letter grades from either the 2018-2019 or 2019-2020 school years. 

The meat of the bill addresses the alternate situation, in which schools stay closed past March and into the indeterminate future. In that scenario, schools can hold onto their funding if they provide instruction in an alternate format. Teachers and staff would continue to receive pay if they carry out their duties remotely or accept another assignment . 

State standardized tests would be canceled, and school letter grades would be held harmless, along with transportation funding.

The legislation doesn’t lay out what this alternative instruction might look like, only directing that the state board of education and Department of Education come up with a way for schools to attest that they’re still delivering a proper education. 

One example Allen provided is the Heber-Overgaard school district in her Northern Arizona legislative District. Many students live in outlying areas and don’t have reliable internet access, so the school is bringing educational materials to its students. 

They’re helping put together packets for every child, and the bus drivers are out delivering them to the outlying areas, then they pick them up,” Allen said. “They help deliver lunch. Everybody is helping the teachers, check things and grade those. So that’s one possibility. Another is you can have online instruction. “ 

Michelle Udall

Michelle Udall

It’s for this reason that some Democrats have taken to dubbing the legislation the Primavera bill, a reference to the online high school that operates in Arizona. But the derision doesn’t mean they won’t back the proposal. 

Rep. Reginald Bolding of Laveen, the top Democrat on the House Education committee, said he recognizes the need for emergency legislation that provides guidance for schools in a time of uncertainty and angst. He’s just worried about the ambition to forgo the committee process and pass the bill by the end of the week, by which time Republican leadership hopes to suspend the session.

“We have to make sure we’re measured and we have to make sure we have stakeholders on board,” he said. “The idea that we’re going to craft policy over the next two or three days that’s going to affect everyone in the state, it’s important that teachers get to see, as well as parents.”

While Bolding said he was in the dark during development of the bill, that appears to be more of a symptom of partisan politics, as school officials have been privy to the plan for a handful of days. 

“We were involved with discussions with the department and the governor’s office, and I think the members were involved in at least one of those discussions,” said Chris Kotterman, a lobbyist for the Arizona School Board Association. “A lot of the concerns we had do appear to be addressed.”

Ditto for the Education Department. 

“Allen and Udall were part of our stakeholders meeting on Monday and we see a lot reflected in this proposal that addresses the concerns voiced by the education community,” said department spokesman Richie Taylor in a text. 

Senate President Karen Fann hoped to bring the bill to the Senate floor for a debate and possible vote on Wednesday evening. But after Democrats in the Senate told her they weren’t ready to vote for it, she instead adjourned the chamber. 

The bill could come up for debate and votes in both the House and Senate on Thursday. 

“We need to do something soon,” Kotterman said. “People will feel a lot better once they know what’s going to happen with their local schools and their children. From a PR perspective, It would do the state some good to get something on the books.”

4 comments

  1. It seems apparent that due to the lengthy school closures, particularly in China, schools will be closed until the summer at least. March 27 is not a realistic date for schools to reopen, and the possibility of containing the spread of COVID-19 without lengthened school closures will be impossible.

    Enter the government. At one time, the government was actually working for the taxpayers, yet because they are part of the problem today, spreading false information, denying our health care worker pleas, it would just make more sense to abandon thoughts of resuming school operations until our country can safely and effectively provide testing services for the roughly 300,000,000 Americans, who is at most risk?

  2. I think here in Az , especially kids with special needs need to go back to school because their classrooms are small , I knees children cannot do online and cannot do other educational things I’m outside the classrooms and it is ridiculous to keep these kids home it would harm them more than it would help them to stay at home and not get trained at all so I feel that we should reopen the schools for at least the private ones for autism or special-needs that can be contained very very well , Please consider the kids and the kids and adult children that are in the in the private schools also vital to the parents that can’t keep them home due to not understanding what’s going on!!!!!!

  3. This is nothing more than a political stunt by Legislative Republicans. Introducing “packets” to students without a certified teacher lacks any understanding of educational pedagogy. All students are not at the same place in their learning, certified teachers are a necessary ingredient for a student to reach different levels of understanding and the state has not uniformly provided computers for students to use or internet to connect them to this as one source of learning. Thinking students and parents can navigate the learning process in a vacuum lacks regard for what students need to know and demonstrate what they can do.

  4. In response to Janet McDonald. Its true kids with special needs are in a smaller class setting but to be honest we (the teachers and children) are more at risk for the virus. There is a lot of saliva and mucus not to mention diaper changing in many of the classrooms. Kids transmit the germs to one another constantly. I know we all want our lives back but please think about everyone this effects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

(Deposit Photos)

Democrats, Ducey PAC, begin election spending (access required)

Democratic PACs are beginning to spend on the general election, spreading money far and wide in an effort to support the party’s attempted takeover of the Legislature.