Key Points: 

• Budget proposes compensation for exonerated inmates

• Proposal includes counseling, training, and educational support services

• Lawmakers believe it creates accountability for state’s past mistakes

Drayton Witt was stabbed 73 times and nearly killed while imprisoned by the state in Winslow.

Now, state lawmakers are deciding whether he and others, who have now been exonerated, should be entitled to compensation.

A proposal tucked into the state budget would entitle Witt to seek financial relief equal to twice the median income for each of the 12 years he was locked up.

The measure crafted by Rep. Khyl Powell would do more than simply write out a check. It also would provide both counseling and job training to those forgiven of their crimes.

And the proposal by the Gilbert Republican also would preclude the state from seeking to reduce the payments by what was paid to house and feed him.

If the measure becomes law, Arizona would join more than three dozen states that have enacted similar programs.

Powell said he is trying to ensure the state is accountable for wrongful imprisonment.

“If you take something from somebody that you can’t give back, how do you measure what you’ve taken?” he asked colleagues.

“It is a bill for erroneous convictions, compensation to those whose lives have been interrupted, disturbed, injured, in ways none of us could imagine,” he told colleagues. “All we’re suggesting here is for the state of Arizona to take full accountability for their mistakes.”

And Powell said mistakes do get made.

“I have not yet met an institution that’s perfect because it’s run or managed by imperfect human beings,” he said.

In Witt’s case, he said he started a small painting company after being released in 2012. But he said it hasn’t been easy to rebuild his life.

“I would lose numerous jobs on a daily basis just simply from a Google search” which turned up his conviction, Witt told lawmakers.

Still, he said, it’s not simply about compensation.

“It’s more about integrity, holding people accountable,” Witt continued.

“At one point in time I voted for somebody to be put in a position of power to look out for my best interests,” he said. “And, instead, those people sent me up the river to die.”

Khalil Rushdan, while supporting the bill, told lawmakers there are just some things about the 15 1/2 years he spent behind bars in Arizona for a false murder conviction that can’t be fixed with money.

“I lost a number of family members, wasn’t able to raise my daughter who was 6 years old when I went in,” he said. “Eight months after I was released, I ended up losing my mom,” Rushdan, who was able to see his mother just four times during his sentencing, said.

“I’m still going through the healing process,” he said.

None of this is automatic. The legislation stipulates that, in order to be considered for compensation, one of several conditions must be met.

One would be a pardon — but only one based on innocence.

Also eligible would be those whose convictions were reversed or vacated, and the charges were dismissed or the person was found not guilty on retrial.

It would also apply to what is known as an “Alford plea.”

That’s where a defendant agrees to plead guilty despite maintaining innocence, but acknowledges that the prosecution has enough evidence to likely obtain a conviction. That can occur to avoid a potentially harsher sentence if found guilty.

To address this, the legislation stipulates that a confession or admission of guilt in the original case cannot be used to charge the person with perjury.

Compensation would be 200% of the median household income for each year incarcerated, though claimants could request more. They could also receive reasonable attorney fees and costs of up to $25,000, as well as up to $100,000 for “reintegrative services and mental and physical health care costs incurred” between the time of release and the entry of a court judgment.

The measure also includes up to 52 hours of mental health treatment within 12 months of a court order at a rate of $250 an hour.

There are also up to 120 credit hours at any college, vocational school or trade school. Powell said that this is particularly justified.

“Their absence of being in the community for 15 or 20 years may have injured their ability to provide for themselves,” he said. “So now they need additional training.”

And the bill provides for up to four financial planning or literacy classes within the first year.

“We provide outlets for them to be fully restituted and be able to recover so that they then can become a productive member of society,” Powell said.

All that comes at a cost.

Legislative analysts reported that there have been 24 exonerations in Arizona since 1989, with an average time spent behind bars of 5.6 years. Assuming just 20% of those exonerated in that time period submit claims, that’s a one-time cost of $4.5 million.

That report also figures, based on historical averages, that the annual cost going forward would be about $641,000.

No one spoke against the measure when it was first proposed. It is now being considered for inclusion as part of a final budget package.