Home / courts / Lawyers in profiling case can’t agree on monitor

Lawyers in profiling case can’t agree on monitor

JLawyers in the racial profiling case against the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office were unable to agree on a recommended candidate to monitor the agency’s operations to ensure it isn’t making unconstitutional arrests.

Instead, attorneys on both sides each recommended three candidates. U.S. District Judge Murray Snow will use the list of recommended prospects to select a monitor for Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s office to ensure it’s complying with constitutional requirements and oversee the re-training of deputies.

Six months ago, Snow ruled Arpaio’s office systematically singled out Latinos in its trademark immigration patrols, marking the first finding by a court that the agency has racially profiled people. The judge also ruled Arpaio’s deputies unreasonably prolonged the detentions of people who were pulled over.

Attorneys who pressed the case against the sheriff’s office recommended Robert S. Warshaw, former associate director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, former U.S. Department of Justice official Joseph E. Brann and Tim Nelson, who served as general counsel for then-Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano.

The sheriff’s office recommended former New York City Police Commissioner Howard Safir, retired Los Angeles police Command Officer Ronald C. Sanchez and retired FBI Agent Joseph R. Wolfinger.

It’s not known when Snow will make his decision

Arpaio’s office isn’t barred from enforcing the state’s immigration laws, but the judge has imposed a long list of restrictions on his immigration patrols, such as a prohibition on using race as a factor in deciding whether to stop a vehicle with a Latino occupant.

Snow later ordered the appointment of a monitor and a community advisory board aimed at helping restore the public’s confidence in the agency.

Arpaio had opposed the appointment of a monitor, arguing it would mean every one of his policy decisions would have to be cleared through the observer and would nullify his authority. His office has appealed the racial profiling finding and the subsequent ruling that ordered the appointment of a monitor.

The U.S. Justice Department filed a similar lawsuit last year that also alleges racial profiling by Arpaio’s office. Its suit, however, claims broader civil rights violations, such as allegations that Arpaio’s agency retaliates against its critics and punishes Latino jail inmates with limited English skills for speaking Spanish. Arpaio denies the claims.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

FILE - This Nov. 17, 2019, file photo shows Kanye West on stage during a service at Lakewood Church in Houston. A law firm with ties to prominent Democrats has filed a lawsuit attempting to keep West off presidential ballots in Virginia. Attorneys for Perkins Coie filed a lawsuit in Richmond on Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2020, on behalf of two people who say they were tricked into signing an “Elector Oath” backing West's candidacy. (AP Photo/Michael Wyke, File)

Lawsuit seeks to ban Kanye West from Arizona ballot

An Arizona resident has asked a judge to bar Kanye West from appearing on the state's November 3 ballot, accusing the hip hop artist of serving as an election spoiler and arguing that a law prohibits him from running in the state as an independent presidential candidate.