Quantcast
Home / Opinion / Letters to the Editor / McSally should stop misleading public about her health care record

McSally should stop misleading public about her health care record

Martha McSally

Martha McSally

Dear Editor:

I recently wrote to U.S. Sen. Martha McSally to express disappointment over her October 30 vote to allow insurance companies to sell “junk” health plans that don’t cover pre-existing conditions. While I appreciated McSally replying to similar criticism, her response was filled with a number of mischaracterizations and outright falsehoods about the Affordable Care Act and her own record on health care.

In her reply, McSally said that “there is no doubt” that the Affordable Care Act has negatively impacted Arizona’s economy and the rights of individuals. That’s simply not true. In fact, the ACA has saved the U.S. economy $2.3 trillion. This year, Arizonans can choose among more plans than ever before.

McSally has said she supports protections for those with pre-existing conditions and allowing children to stay on their parents’ insurance until age 26. But thanks to the ACA, those protections already exist, and now that she’s voted to allow insurers to sell junk health plans, those protections are threatened once again.

She said that “having an illness should not be a ticket to bankruptcy.” I couldn’t agree more. That’s why I was so disappointed by her vote to let insurers sell junk plans that don’t offer basic protections, including coverage for those with pre-existing conditions.

Lastly, McSally said that health care plans “must not discriminate against women.” Again, I agree, but I’m not sure McSally is updated on her own voting record. Before the ACA, pregnancy was considered a pre-existing condition, which allowed insurance companies to charge mothers more.

Sen. McSally, please stop misleading Arizonans about your health care record.

Pat Thomas

Tolleson

2 comments

  1. Honesty must apply all around. Insurance is about pooling risk—it protects against the risk of something bad happening that can be catastrophically expensive. Buying insurance for a “pre-existing condition” is like trying to buy homeowner’s insurance for your house after it burns down. If the risk has already happened, it’s not insurance, it’s charity.

    The federal government has no Constitutional authority to regulate, insure, or provide health care. For all the good or bad that can be said about the ACA, those activities can only be legally performed at the state level.

  2. I’m doing my homework in advance of upcoming elections. I am a “pre-existing condition,” albeit a very healthy one. So obviously, a political candidate’s stance/record on this is extremely important to me.

    McSally’s voting record on this issue s appalling and disgraceful. I find it difficult to elect someone who shows total lack of regard for those of us caught in the middle of this firestorm.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

building-featured

Pandemic reshaping future for millions of college students

It is likely an understatement to say that the novel coronavirus pandemic has affected every dimension of contemporary life. Amid the upheaval and uncertainty, the ...