Quantcast
Don't Miss
Home / Opinion / Commentary / TUSK should stop misrepresenting Doug Little’s views

TUSK should stop misrepresenting Doug Little’s views

Arizona Corporation Commission Chairman Bob Stump listens during comments from the public on the proposal to change the state's solar net metering system. (Photo by Evan Wyloge/Arizona Capitol Times)

Arizona Corporation Commission Chairman Bob Stump listens during comments from the public on the proposal to change the state’s solar net metering system. (Photo by Evan Wyloge/Arizona Capitol Times)

My friend, Barry Goldwater Jr., paid spokesman for TUSK (“Tell Utilities Solar Won’t Be Killed”), has spoken on the race for Arizona Corporation Commission, and his words are an incitement to hearty debate. I write in defense of the candidate I have endorsed, Doug Little, whose candidacy has elicited a degree of ferocity that is entirely disproportionate to his views — which are mainstream — and disrespectful of his values, which are stellar.

Goldwater says that utility monopolies’ spending on candidates for Corporation Commission is akin to “purchas[ing] politicians beholden to them,” which means “our rates will go up as those elected will be indebted to those who spent to put them there.”

Goldwater surely knows that Doug Little is no more “beholden” or “indebted” to APS’s unbidden alleged “dark money” spending than Vernon Parker and Lucy Mason are to TUSK, given TUSK’s largesse on their behalf. Spending is spending, and transparency regarding donors is entirely beside the point when considering the integrity of these candidates, all four of whom have it in spades.

Goldwater offers zero evidence — none — in presenting a portrait of Little that would make Attila the Hun blush (if he were a utility regulator). And he tears a page from the Democratic playbook which he strains constantly to deplore: Little’s policies would harm seniors, churches, and schools — perhaps even the Little Sisters of Charity — because he is “vehemently anti-solar.”

Never mind that Little has made no comments to that effect. Contrary to the deceptive signs erected by TUSK, Little does not support the Arizona Department of Revenue’s position on taxing leased rooftop solar systems — he’s said so, publicly, at the Arizona Investment Council debate, on July 16, 2014: “I don’t agree with the DOR’s position, [and] my position is being misrepresented.”

Little is pro-solar but equally intent on protecting ratepayers — a position which TUSK, whose members are out-of-state solar companies with scant incentive to concern themselves with the pocketbooks of Arizona ratepayers, apparently finds objectionable. TUSK and its supporters’ hardball campaign style — declaring those with contrary views as “haters” of solar, “liars” and “[Expletive] of the Day” and professing crocodile-tear concerns for Republican electoral vulnerabilities — is, sadly, on partial display in Goldwater’s letter.

Let me be blunt: Those with varying degrees of enthusiasm for President Obama’s energy agenda have shrewdly chosen to triangulate by deploying Republican spokespersons to tar conservatives — such as Little — as liberals. It is telling that TUSK has spent not one cent opposing any Democrat running for any office. Instead, it professes to save the Republican Party from itself by working to defeat Republicans.

It is too cute by half, and the irony makes the mind reel: Out-of-state solar company executives — fond of the president’s agenda, with business before the commission, and financially supportive of their preferred commission candidates — painting as an Obama supporter a conservative whose integrity, they claim, is in doubt because he is the beneficiary of alleged political spending from a utility with business before the Commission.

TUSK’s behavior speaks volumes. Little’s views and character would speak for themselves, if only TUSK would stop misrepresenting them.

Bob Stump is chairman of the Arizona Corporation Commission

4 comments

  1. Seriously, Bob?

    You’re saying that TUSK has made it impossible for Doug Little to state his views or demonstrate his character?

    Wouldn’t your conclusion suggest less strength of character on Mr. Little’s part than you seem to infer?

  2. Well said Mr. Stump, well said.

  3. We need to shine a light on the dark funding that is trying to buy the Corporation Commission, so far over 1.2 million. http://www.NoSecretFunds.com The Arizona Corporation Commission, and Bob Stump their chairman, could order public utilities to report any expenditures to influence the election of the Commission charged with regulating them. Let’s demand that our Corporation Commission defend their integrity and independence by ensuring that voters have information on secret funding of the elections. We can request the same from the solar industry, though we already know how much funding their organization, TUSK, is putting into the election.

  4. APS is no right to influence voters or support people like Little running for the ACC they area monopoly not a normal corporation. I’m forced to take their product because I can’t buy it from anyone else. This is no different then the city of Phoenix water department using public tax money to influence a mayor to be elected. It should be illegal for a utility to have anything to do with it. Solar city or TUSK is different I don’t have to buy solar, and I don’t have to buy from Solar city. I have a choice but I don’t with APS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Scroll To Top