Home / Opinion / Letters to the Editor / Maricopa County reduced budget by 89 million

Maricopa County reduced budget by 89 million

Steve Chucri (photo from the Steve Chucri facebook page)

Steve Chucri (photo from the Steve Chucri facebook page)

I’m fortunate to have many great friends and colleagues at the Capitol and I’m pleased to continue to work with the Capitol community in new ways as an elected official of Maricopa County. Because the county’s financial decisions impact millions of people in a variety of important ways, I wanted to share my process in working through budget decisions since taking office in January.

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors recently adopted the budget for the 2014 fiscal year. First and foremost, our $2.2 billion general fund operating budget is actually lower than last year’s, by some $89 million.

Secondly, it comes with an actual reduction in county-controlled property taxes, roughly $32 million less than what the county collected last year. Moreover, Maricopa County remainsfree of general obligation debt.

Arizona’s economic outlook continues to improve, with retail sales, housing values, and other key components of our economy on the rise. However, county revenues — primarily dependent on property taxes — are only marginally higher. There is much to celebrate about Arizona’s continued comeback, but we must remain cautious and responsible when planning for thefuture.

This is why county leaders have launched a top-to-bottom review of our current programming and capital needs. I believe Maricopa County government has many positive attributes, but any business must constantly measure itself and compare its performance against the highest and best, public or private. That’s how we get better. And in today’s world, if you’re not improving, you’re falling behind.

Furthermore, our fiscal conservatism and business-minded approach did not blind us to a troubling turnover issue. The salary and hiring freezes put in place for county employees in 2007 as a result of the economic downturn put greater pressure on our top-performing professionals — especially in public safety, which comprises more than 50 percent of our budget. We made a good first step in ensuring we retain the best of county talent by including performance and market-based adjustments in critical areas for the first time in six years. When you run any business, the principles remain the same — the lynchpin of success is the quality of talent that business employs.

For this fiscal year, we provided for the needs of public safety, focused on our core functions and doing them well, and planned for our long-term economic health. This way, we willhave our county wellpositioned for the future, whatever it may bring.

We will continue the detailed review of operations, especially at our regulatory agencies. We have to make sure our processes are not overly burdensome on businesses or confusing to citizens.

These were not easy budget decisions to make, but the finished product is one that keeps vital services intact without increasing the overall property tax rate on homeowners and businesses.

Steve Chucri, member, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, District 2.


  1. Concerned Citizen

    Slash the PR and advertising budgets for the politically driven, County Sheriff and the County Attorney’s offices. That’s an easy decision. Sick of my tax dollars funding their campaigns to destroy people, our rights and the justice system.

  2. We want to thank Sheriff Joe and Bill Montgomery for their unfailing devotion to public safety–we want them to have an adequate budget to continue doing what is needed to ensure the safety of all citizens of all colors

  3. Concerned Citizen

    #2 – GOP troll.

  4. What is the status of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office occupying the Penthouse floors of the luxury Wells Fargo Bank building? People were protesting that back in 2005? How about those taxpayers’ dollars?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also


Arizona should be next state to rein in step-therapy

When a patient goes to their personal doctor because they are experiencing a significant health struggle, they do so with the trust that their doctor will recommend a treatment based on a specific understanding of the unique complexities of their condition. All too frequently, however, the treatment agreed between patient and doctor is being delayed if not wholly pre-empted by a process imposed by insurance companies known as “step therapy.”