Quantcast
Home / agencies / No ironclad proof: Case against Horne is circumstantial, but that may be enough (access required)

No ironclad proof: Case against Horne is circumstantial, but that may be enough (access required)

There isn’t necessarily a smoking gun in the campaign coordination case against Attorney General Tom Horne and Kathleen Winn, but election law experts say the circumstantial evidence against them may be enough.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

Debbie Lesko (Photo by Katie Campbell/Arizona Capitol Times)

Lesko threatens CD8 rival Lovas with litigation (access required)

Debbie Lesko is threatening to sue Phil Lovas, one of her rivals in the Republican primary for the 8th Congressional District, over allegations he made regarding $50,000 she contributed from her state Senate re-election committee to a super PAC that’s aiding her campaign.