Quantcast
Home / courts / Border shooting trial set

Border shooting trial set

In this April 5, 2007 file photo, Border Patrol agent recruits practice small arms firing as senior agents, in red, watch at the Border Patrol Academy in Artesia, N.M. (AP Photo/Matt York, File)

In this April 5, 2007 file photo, Border Patrol agent recruits practice small arms firing as senior agents, in red, watch at the Border Patrol Academy in Artesia, N.M. (AP Photo/Matt York, File)

Lonnie Swartz will go on trial in federal court on Oct. 12 for shooting and killing a teen across the border in Mexico.

U.S. District Court Judge Raner Collins set the date on Friday, months after rejecting the contention of the Border Patrol agent he can’t be tried in his court.

Collins said he will resolve all remaining pretrial issues at a hearing on June 19. And he set a deadline for any plea deal of Sept. 22.

Swartz, on duty at the time, has not disputed that he fired shots through an opening in the border fence at 16-year-old Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez who was on the Sonora side of the line. An autopsy concluded 10 of them hit the teen in the back.

But Swartz, now on administrative leave, contends he fired in self-defense, saying the boy was throwing rocks across the border.

That explanation has been in dispute, if for no other reason than the Mexican side of the border sits around 25 feet lower than the Arizona side.

Swartz’s attorney had attempted to have the case thrown out of federal court, contending that the case should be tried in state court. But Collins, in a ruling earlier this year, said Swartz was standing in a 60-foot zone adjacent to the border at the time of the incident, land he said is federal property.

Meanwhile, a separate civil suit against Swartz by the youth’s parents remains on hold.

The issue there is whether federal courts in this country have jurisdiction to hear the complaint as Elena Rodriguez was shot and died in Mexico.

Attorneys for his family have argued to federal appellate judges that the incident originated in the United States, making it appropriate to have it heard in courts in this country.

But the judges in this case said they won’t decide that issue until there is a ruling in a similar case out of Texas where a border Patrol agent in 2010 shot and killed a Mexican teen playing in a culvert that separates El Paso from Juarez.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled the parents cannot pursue their claim against Jesus Mesa Jr. because the boy, Sergio Hernandez, was a Mexican citizen “who was on Mexican soil at the time he was shot.”

But that case is now on review to the U.S. Supreme Court. Whatever the justices rule in that case likely will determine whether the civil case against Swartz can continue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

Cutline: In this screen capture of a political ad, APS is uses a picture of the ballot, with the revised language added by a top aide to Attorney General Mark Brnovich, to convince voters to reject Proposition 127.

AG’s office changes wording on Prop 127 ballot

A key aide to Attorney General Mark Brnovich altered language of the ballot description of Proposition 127 that the state's top elections officer called "eyebrow raising'' and the lawyer for initiative organizers said is designed to help Arizona Public Service convince voters to reject it.