Quantcast
Home / Governor's Office / Ducey signs bill to keep secrecy of anonymous campaign donors

Ducey signs bill to keep secrecy of anonymous campaign donors

DarkMOney620

Arizona cities are losing their right to demand that nonprofit groups seeking to sway local elections divulge who is financing the effort.

Gov. Doug Ducey late Thursday signed legislation which preempts local ordinances that require these groups to register as political action committees. More to the point, the measure which takes effect this summer makes any effort to identify contributions off limits.

The new law, however, could face an uncertain future.

By a margin of 9-1, Tempe residents voted earlier this year to mandate disclosure of spending on local races. That new ordinance also requires that voters be told who is behind any effort that spends more than $1,000.

But Tempe is a “charter city,” constitutionally entitled to enact laws on strictly local matters. And the Arizona Supreme Court has ruled on two separate occasions that local elections in charter cities are not subject to state oversight.

It is not known whether Tempe will challenge the new law as an unconstitutional infringement on local powers. But other charter cities, including Phoenix, are considering similar measures.

There also is currently a statewide initiative drive being pushed by former Phoenix Mayor Terry Goddard which would put a “right to know” provision in the Arizona Constitution to require that all sources of $10,000 or more be made public. If it makes the November ballot and is approved, it could override any state laws.

This law, pushed by Rep. Vince Leach, R-Tucson, is aimed at gaining protection for donors to “social welfare” groups that spend money to help elect or defeat certain candidates through independent expenditures.

Ducey has been supportive in the past of allowing anonymous donations. And he himself has been the beneficiary of such expenditures.

He got elected governor in 2014 with the help of $8.2 million spent by outside groups both supporting his election and running commercials attacking Democrat foe Fred DuVal. That eclipsed the $7.9 million Ducey spent on his own, money that came from disclosed donors.

That wasn’t just a one-way street. DuVal benefited from $2.4 million in independent expenditures compared to his own $4.3 million campaign.

The governor has said he believes in transparency. But he also said there’s a valid reason to allow people to contribute anonymously to campaigns.

“I think people have a First Amendment right as well to participate and not be bullied,” he said.

That’s the same argument advanced by Leach in pushing the legislation through the House and, just this past week, by Senate Republicans in giving their own approval.

“Citizens have a right to privacy,” said Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake. “They have a right to give their money to whatever cause they deem is right.”

She also said there is as need for privacy.

“The problem is that the Left will use this information and they harass businesses,” Allen said.

3 comments

  1. bradley taylor hudson

    Ducey does not work for us. He works for special interests. How could anyone vote for a person who tells us we should not have a right to know who controls our government? This stretch of the right to free speech is absurd. Politics is a public enterprise. Those who wish to participate anonymously have to be stopped. Money in pollitics is by far the biggest reason we constantly wonder why our government does not seem to operate in our best interests. Politicians have to satisfy the people who put them in office. Money is what puts them in office. If we don’t know who supplies the money, we don’t know who they answer to. Ducey clearly needs to keep money sources secret. It is part of his job. We need him, and anyone else wanting to keep their money sources secret, out of office.

  2. Absurd stretch of the right to free speech. And the last comment indicates they put this in place so the Left can’t practice the true right to free speech by picketing or boycotting those businesses that support candidates or causes they are not in agreement with. Talk about selectively using the right to free speech just for Republicans. Our state congress is bought and paid for and is doing everything to protect the right to be bought off privately.

  3. This is not an easy topic. There is a history of US Supreme Court cases where the Court decided that people have a right to speak and support groups anonymously. For example, the Court protected people’s right to belong to the NAACP anonymously at a time when those people could have been boycotted or threatened or murdered in the South. It seems pretty clear to me anyway that the right to free speech must include the right to be anonymous to protect those who wish to speak unpopular things. On the other hand, we also see where large groups and corporations and people with a lot of money use anonymity to support candidates and hide their identity in a way that can harm the free flow of information and potentially harm us- they hide their motives and true goals. So, I would not be so quick to conclude that Governor Ducey is beholden to special interests, nor would I be so quick to conclude that Tempe is just trying to expose conservatives and businesses in order to allow liberals to boycott them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

lawsuit-web

Navajo Nation suit could delay final vote count

The Navajo Nation is claiming that the state and several counties illegally discriminated against tribal members and kept them from having their votes counted.