Quantcast
Home / Opinion / Letters to the Editor / Inadequate site review process could spell disaster for Resolution mine

Inadequate site review process could spell disaster for Resolution mine

Your May 31 article on the mine near Superior “Gosar seeks broad support for Resolution Copper land-swap bill” fails to mention the hopelessly inadequate public review process allowed in the proposed legislation.  If the bill is passed, the Interior Department has one year to finalize the exchange.  At that point, some 2,400 acres of land around the mine site would become Resolution’s private property, and the federal nexus required for review as provided for under the National Environmental Policy Act is lost.

This is no way to allow construction of what some consider the largest proposed mine in the lower 48 states.  The environmental impacts are guaranteed to be enormous, from land subsidence the size and depth of Meteor Crater to massive tailings piles around Highway 60 to contaminated and depleted ground and surface water.  Yes, the mine would create some jobs, but if I were a betting man I’d wager more workers would need to be hired cleaning up the mess after closure than during operation.

— Don Steuter, Phoenix

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

x

Check Also

China United States trade and American tariffs as two opposing cargo ships as an economic  taxation dispute over import and exports concept as a 3D illustration.

U.S. dependence on China for medicine a major problem

As tensions between the U.S. and China escalate, Washington is waking up to the threat posed by Beijing’s longstanding espionage and cyber hacking. But there’s another looming problem – and one that’s been overlooked for too long: America’s growing dependence on China for prescription drugs.