Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion / Commentary / Arizona residents are the winners with Supreme Court voter registration ruling

Arizona residents are the winners with Supreme Court voter registration ruling

Sam Wercinski (file photo)

On June 17, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the right of every eligible American to register to vote using a national standard that eliminates unnecessary barriers. The decision was authored by one of the court’s strongest state’s rights advocates, Justice Antonin Scalia.

This decision requires Arizona’s election officials to accept the federal voter registration form without requiring more documentation. The court, in short, rejects that part of Proposition 200 that has blocked more than 31,000 eligible Arizonans from registering to vote. That’s the equivalent of disenfranchising the entire voting populations of Kingman, Prescott and Sierra Vista. Imagine the outrage if that occurred.

Arizona residents are big winners with this victory.  The right to vote — for all Americans — was hard won, requiring a civil war and the adoption of constitutional amendments. Laws that weaken the right to vote are unwise and push against the constitutional grain. Politicians who push these laws will be remembered unfavorably by voters on Election Day.

Prop. 200 is, and always was, a political tool to make voting harder by frightening citizens with unsubstantiated and disingenuous claims of rampant voter fraud. The template for such bills comes from extremist organizations like the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a corporate-backed “bill mill” accused of tax fraud.

Underlying the movement to suppress the vote is cynicism about honest Americans, and fear of the power of an engaged citizenry. The negativity is evident in criticism of the court’s decision and legislation like SB1454 and HB2305, laws passed this legislative session that create unnecessary obstacles to voting and civic participation. While states like Colorado are making it easier to vote and increasing election integrity, Arizona politicians are working to discourage voting so they can retain power. Arizona officials now plan to waste more taxpayer dollars by appealing a second time to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, an agency currently with no commissioners or decision-making authority.

Instead, Arizona officials should be working to engage voters and end the harmful effects of the Citizens United decision, which opened the floodgates to unlimited, undisclosed money influencing our elections and misinforming voters. Money to buy elections can and does flow from foreign-controlled companies and individuals. In full knowledge of this risk, our legislators still passed HB2593, which violates the voter approved Clean Elections Act and helps wealthy special interests exert significant influence over elections and policymaking.

Laws like HB2305, SB1454, and HB2593 undermine our democracy and erode the confidence of every citizen who values the integrity of our electoral system. We have to question the sincerity of those who trumpet fears that ineligible residents are rushing to the polls, while simultaneously swinging the door wide open for big-money groups to sway our elections through massive political spending.

Arizonans expect and deserve free, fair and accessible elections. Arizona officials should welcome the Supreme Court’s decision against Prop. 200, which furthers this goal. It is time to discard their strategy of imposing more restrictions on voters while empowering super PACs and wealthy individuals who can buy influence with campaign cash.

The National Voter Registration Act moves us in the right direction, facilitating the noble work of civic engagement organizations and allowing tens of thousands of new Americans to register to vote.  Arizona Advocacy Network and other reputable non-partisan groups stand ready to help elections officials ensure the accuracy of federal form applications and improve the integrity of our elections through voter education and voter-friendly policies.

Arizonans want to move forward, together. It’s time for politicians to embrace the Supreme Court’s decision and work inclusively for government of, by and for the People.

— Sam Wercinski is executive director and Doris Marie Provine is president of the Arizona Advocacy Network.


  1. The right to vote belongs to citizens. If you are a citizen and care about the sanctity of the ballot box why would you have a problem with proving proof of your citizenship when you FIRST sign up to vote either at 18 or if you move to another state??

    The SCOTUS has been wrong many times on decisions they make when they cite Federal Law and NOT the Constitution. Read Article 1 Section 4– the States decide the “manner and holding” of elections. The 15th and 19th Amendments are the ONLY Constitutional clarifications of Art 1 Sec 4.

  2. To suggest that it is a barrier to ask for proof of citizenship is not credible! But allowing people to vote who are not citizens destroys the people’s trust in the integrity of the vote. The Supreme Court was wrong in its decision. At least the Supreme Court said Arizona can still require proof of citizenship. I hope Arizona will!

  3. A civic duty to watch this film. How we got here and where we’re headed. It does not bode well for the people or the middle class. Wake up folks, as your “leaders” celebrate the undoing of America’s democracy. Watch who is celebrating it and vote in the next “primary” where these extremists are selected by their party.

    Bill Moyers: “UNITED STATES OF ALEC” — A Viewers Guide | PR Watch

    1. Watch the film online here. Then share it (and this viewers’ guide) with friends and family.

    2. Follow the ALEC Exposed Project. Check out a wealth of information about ALEC, including links to reports, resources, actions and much more at CMD’s award winning ALEC Exposed project website here.


  4. Look at this years long agenda. No wonder why they wanted to arrest the protesters in Scottsdale
    at the ALEC conference. They didn’t want the public to be “educated” just the legislators.

    Bill Moyers: United States of ALEC — A Viewers Guide | PR Watch

    5. Read more about the ALEC agenda. CMD’s Executive Director Lisa Graves spoke in the film about more than 800 ALEC “model” bills that were provided to her by a whistleblower in 2011. You can find all these on the ALEC Exposed website here, plus check our factsheets about:

    ALEC & Jobs
    ALEC & the Economy
    ALEC & Education
    ALEC & Privatization
    ALEC & Health Care
    ALEC & Women and Families
    ALEC & the Environment

  5. What’s to celebrate when a devious agenda has been in place at the expense of the people and their lives. CCA hasn’t dropped out yet. Why?

    Shareholders Push Firms to Cut Ties to ALEC; 49 Corporations Now Out

    by Rebekah Wilce — June 25, 2013 – 7:29am
    Topics: Activism, Corporations, Politics
    Projects: ALEC Exposed

    Scores of investors working together through Ceres and the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility are challenging companies that fund the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), reminding them that such support backs ALEC’s anti-environmental agenda. In response, four corporations have confirmed that they have cut or are cutting ties with ALEC:

    GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), a British pharmaceutical company with £26.4 billion in annual revenue;
    Brown-Forman, a Louisville, Kentucky alcohol company with $2.8 billion in annual revenue;
    Unilever, a food, home, and personal care products corporation based in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom with a combined €51.3 billion in annual revenue;
    and ConocoPhillips, a Houston oil company with $58 billion in annual revenue.
    In addition, Publix Super Markets announced via social media in response to a customer challenge this week that it “has not been a member of ALEC since 2011.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

slander, postcards, candidates, Scottsdale Unified School District, governing board, literature, vote

Vote for caring candidates for Scottsdale governing board, avoid those mailing false, slanderous postcards (access required)

This letter is to inform Scottsdale Unified School District residents of a group or individuals who are mailing false and slanderous postcards to voters.