Home / Opinion / Commentary / How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Media (Ironically Speaking)

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Media (Ironically Speaking)

“Irony,” says literary critic Harold Bloom, “demands a certain attention span, and the ability to sustain antithetical ideas, even when they collide with one another.”

An ironical stance acknowledges a certain absurdity and humor in life and politics, and is conducive to self-awareness. Irony is an antidote to ideology, leavening it with a dose of intellectual humility. It bursts pomposity. As such, it is a quality much-needed in government today.

Bob Stump

Bob Stump

Yet our political climate is conducive neither to sustained attention spans nor the consideration of antithetical ideas — let alone irony.

As the stakes and rancor of politics increase, the capacity for irony dissolves.  As does a talent for self-awareness — even among members of a class which perceives itself as engaged, self-critical and enlightened: the media.

Case in point: The media coverage of the tiresome soap opera invented by the far-left, dark-money fringe group, The Checks and Balances Project.

Checks and Balances has spent months concocting increasingly fantastical conspiracy theories by connecting random dots and events. Their campaign of innuendo and insinuation, worthy of Joseph McCarthy, is payback for my criticism of TUSK’s hardball tactics in the 2014 election and my support of last year’s compromise forged by the Residential Utility Consumer Office and the rooftop solar industry — a compromise, ironically, which APS and Checks and Balances both opposed.

From the start, my stance on dark money has been clear: I would prefer it play no part in the election of commissioners. I am a regulator, not an elections officer, and my duties do not entail unearthing the source of the anonymous spending that engulfed the 2014 commission election, nor the “clean energy” dollars footing Checks and Balances’ romps in the mud.

The media care little about the dark money fueling Checks and Balances but are preoccupied with its fantasies. Would the media hang on every utterance of the John Birch Society? Doubtful. Yet every lapse into paranoia on the part of Checks and Balances — an equally wacky group — is treated by much of the media not as a cry for therapeutic intervention but as breaking news.

The irony is rich:The media is apoplectic about APS’s refusal to reveal its alleged role in funding dark money campaigns to influence the commission, even as a dark money organization — Checks and Balances — accuses commissioners of being in thrall to dark money and strives to influence the commission’s votes by trying to intimidate it.

Imagine a dark money-funded group financed by utilities, attempting to bully the commission into voting in a way that benefits its benefactors.  Imagine that this group’s mission is to destroy commissioners’ reputations beyond repair and burden the commission with endless legal maneuverings.  Moreover, its aim is to manufacture phony scandals to aid their preferred candidates for the commission, in 2016.

One can scarcely imagine the media outrage.Yet Checks and Balances, funded by “clean energy” interests, is doing precisely this.

How quickly I forget: Solar companies are not regulated by the Commission.  Hence their behavior is beyond reproach and their contributions to affect commission races are never even potentially corrupting to candidates.  Only utility contributions — dark or otherwise — are corrupting.  Never mind that the commission’s decisions on net metering and a multitude of policies are portrayed as “do or die” by the rooftop solar industry.

The ironies – seemingly lost on the media – abound. Much of the media instructs us that dark money is dark by virtue of its anonymity.  How commissioners may be corrupted by entities whose identities are a mystery is itself a mystery.

In this ironic moral universe, spending on behalf of commissioners’ campaigns by entities commissioners know are spending on their behalf, such as TUSK, is not corrupting.

For the record, while I did not text members of the Trilateral Commission, the Porcellian, or Skull and Bones, I did text Paul Walker, Bill Gates and a lawyer with a fake-sounding name: “Court Rich.” Draw your own conclusions as to the legitimacy of these numbers and names.

It has been said (ironically said, that is) that liberals love humanity but disdain individuals. Regarding the media, I say the opposite: I love many of its members — particularly Arizona Capitol Times reporters — but dislike the media. This, too, my friends, is a comment infused with irony.

In our politics and our media, may irony bloom. Our democracy will be healthier for it. And the happenings of the Arizona Corporation Commission will be less boring. But I’m being ironic.

-Bob Stump is a member of the Arizona Corporation Commission.


  1. Oh Bob, you’re so clever. Clever enough to get away with destroying State property (and the evidence it contained) — but not clever enough to fool us into thinking the “far-left, dark-money fringe group” is the problem because we all know they didn’t destroy State property; you did.

  2. Bob, I am anything but a Bleeding Heart Liberal, and far from a John Birch-er, but you have missed the whole point with the Dark Money. The companies being regulated should have a total hands off of the election process. I spent my career with APS and was told it was hands off of the political process as it related to my or my association with the Commission. I spent eight years as an elected official, and would not take any money from those who would like to buy a vote. I also have a Solar System that I own. You will have a hard time convincing me that i am impacting the Grid as it has been proposed. I doubt that any of the KWhrs that I generate even leave my block. That means there is less line loss on the grid for the vast majority of the time. I monitor my system very close, and seldom does my system require any peak time at all. In my career i was tasked with encouraging solar energy, not discouraging it. My how times have changed. There are quite a few of us that own our systems and do not like to be classified with those that only lease out their property. My investment, like others, comes out of my own pocket, and you are not doing yourself any favors by classifying us as related to some extreme group. We do have friends and neighbors that are constantly asking us what the true story is. By your statements, you have classified yourself!!!!

  3. I work for a solar company and everyone who has solar panels on their roof, saves money. We offer them a customized proposal with state of the art software to see if they can save money by going solar, if they can then they do, if they can’t then they don’t. It is as simple as that. AZ has corrupt politicians who care more about money than the people they serve then we have corporate monopolies like APS giving their money to politicians. Let the people you serve save money, please.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also


Tax exemption for digital goods will leave 9-figure budget hole (access required)

But this week, the Legislature proposes to take away at least another $183 million of tax revenue per year without any potential for future economic benefit. Unlike other tax reductions approved by the Legislature in recent years, eliminating the transaction privilege tax, or TPT, on digital goods doesn’t help the state attract one new job or encourage one business to relocate.