Home / Opinion / Commentary / Proposition 205 won’t bring in the promised revenue

Proposition 205 won’t bring in the promised revenue


I am writing to voice my opposition to Proposition 205 and the legalization of recreational marijuana in Arizona. My intention is to inform the public about critical facts that are missing from the discussion about the taxation of the marijuana industry, and why they should view with skepticism the major claim of Proposition 205 proponents; namely, that the legalization will bring in additional tax revenue, particularly for schools.

The marijuana industry in Arizona has failed to follow basic state law regarding the listing and reporting of their business personal property in Arizona. What is business personal property? Basically, every business owns personal property that they utilize to operate their business. This can range from basic things like computers, office furniture and storage racks to specialized equipment that a marijuana growing facility might use like grow boxes, air filtration systems, misting and drip systems, special lighting. These items all have value and must be reported to the county assessor in the county that they are located each year.

The law requiring the listing and reporting of business personal property is a self-reporting, or “on-your-honor” system, which law-abiding businesses in this state comply with. Businesses as large as Intel, Discount Tire, Wal-Mart, and then on down to those smaller “mom and pop” business owners do their best to accurately and timely report business personal property to my office. In fact, there are nearly 10,000 separate business personal property accounts listed with the Maricopa County Assessor’s Office. Marijuana business owners, growers and dispensaries, on the other hand, have failed to file anything since they became legal to operate in 2012. By my best estimates, there are approximately 50 dispensaries in Maricopa County, and not a single one has complied with the law.

Why does this matter? Because nearly 70 percent of taxes collected from the assessment of business personal property taxes goes to fund local education. This means that non-compliance by the marijuana industry in Arizona in listing their business personal property and their subsequent failure to pay any taxes whatsoever is impacting the education of our children. After the Great Recession, with leadership from Governor Ducey, Arizonans approved Proposition 123 to get over $1 billion in new funding to schools. Yet, at the same time state leaders are looking for ways to obtain more dollars for schools, the marijuana industry shirks their legal obligations to pay their fair share of taxes on the personal property used in the creation of a product still illegal under federal law.

I hear talk by the marijuana industry that the passage of recreational marijuana will bring more tax dollars into Arizona, and also that the passage of Proposition 205 will legitimize what has previously been a black market business. My response is, how can we trust the marijuana industry, which will be, by law, comprised  of the same actors already in business, to act like legitimate business owners when they have evaded their responsibility to follow the law like everyone else? There is an old saying that bears repeating here: “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.” Arizonans would be wise to remember this when they decide how they vote on Proposition 205. I, however, refuse to be made the fool by the marijuana industry and will vote “No” on November 8.

Paul Petersen is Maricopa County assessor.


The views expressed in guest commentaries are those of the author and are not the views of the Arizona Capitol Times.


  1. Oh please. You’re sounding desperate. Next time, we’ll count the chairs in the lobby.

  2. Why does everything have to be about money to you people.


    This is why I’m voting YES ON 205.

  3. PS Paul Petersen is identified as a Republican politician by a Maricopa Co. GOP voters club: http://gop.scwclubs.com/candidates/. One wonders, does he or doesn’t he support Donald Trump, who hasn’t paid taxes — probably in AZ as elsewhere — for the last 18 years? One might expect a tax assessor to be consistently hard on these issues. Where’s Petersen’s renunciation of Trump? Nowhere. More hypocrisy.

  4. The crooks that support this prohibition are truly getting desperate and they care little about protecting people in Arizona. They ignore that many in Arizona already use marijuana and that our underground market is controlled by some of the most violent criminals in the hemisphere, the Mexican drug cartels. These folks do not ask for ID’s and they also make available fentanyl, cocaine, crystal meth, ecstasy, and black tar heroin to our kids. Call me crazy but it makes sense to me to have marijuana sold by legal retailers who do not sell other drugs and ask for ID’s. This is working to decrease underground sales in Colorado. While they fight marijuana that has never killed by overdose in all of human history they ignore the fact that more Arizonans die of opiate overdose deaths than die of traffic accidents. We need to focus our priorities on those substances that do kill Arizonans.

    “The elimination of the unregulated black market is often cited by legalization proponents as a benefit of creating a legal, commercial marijuana market. In Colorado and Washington, those black markets have persisted to an extent, frustrating regulators and providing fodder for legalization critics. The new report suggests, however, that the black market is being significantly reduced by legalization, and that those reductions will continue.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Check Also

Voting ballot box isometric vector icon with paper sheet

To let independents into party primaries would spoil choice

There is a reason the Los Angeles Dodgers don’t get to pick the starting pitchers for the Arizona Diamondbacks when they play against them.